<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve had it with Vista.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/</link>
	<description>tech stuff from a tech bloke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox3</title>
		<link>http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukstokes.com/blog/?p=452#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>Windows for Workgroups 3.11 had its issues.  Windows &quot;Major Error&quot; (Millennium Edition / Me) was a royal pain.  But Windows Vista takes Microsoft&#039;s blunders to a whole new low.  Run, run far away.

The halfway decent ones were Windows 3.1, Windows 95b/c (OSR 2.x), Windows 98SE, Windows 2K Pro, &amp; Windows XP Pro.  I never had much experience with Windows NT 4.5, so I can&#039;t say one way or the other.

I&#039;ve downloaded the RC for Windows 7, but I don&#039;t have a machine to test it on as yet.  I&#039;ll have to pull one out of service to &quot;play&quot; with.  Sorry readers, as of 5 days ago (2009.08.20), MS was supposed to have pulled the plug on W7RC downloads.

From the reviews I&#039;ve read thus far, W7 is supposed to be what Vista was intended to be (but Vista was rushed out the door prematurely).

I don&#039;t use Vista and don&#039;t recommend it to anyone.  However, my largest client is running Windows Server 2008 Small Business Server in his office, which shares some features and/or components with the dreaded Vista.  Well, let me get back to troubleshooting a problem with that SBS08 box.  It seems to be related to a recent update too.

:-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows for Workgroups 3.11 had its issues.  Windows "Major Error" (Millennium Edition / Me) was a royal pain.  But Windows Vista takes Microsoft's blunders to a whole new low.  Run, run far away.</p>
<p>The halfway decent ones were Windows 3.1, Windows 95b/c (OSR 2.x), Windows 98SE, Windows 2K Pro, &amp; Windows XP Pro.  I never had much experience with Windows NT 4.5, so I can't say one way or the other.</p>
<p>I've downloaded the RC for Windows 7, but I don't have a machine to test it on as yet.  I'll have to pull one out of service to "play" with.  Sorry readers, as of 5 days ago (2009.08.20), MS was supposed to have pulled the plug on W7RC downloads.</p>
<p>From the reviews I've read thus far, W7 is supposed to be what Vista was intended to be (but Vista was rushed out the door prematurely).</p>
<p>I don't use Vista and don't recommend it to anyone.  However, my largest client is running Windows Server 2008 Small Business Server in his office, which shares some features and/or components with the dreaded Vista.  Well, let me get back to troubleshooting a problem with that SBS08 box.  It seems to be related to a recent update too.</p>
<p>:-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecilia</title>
		<link>http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukstokes.com/blog/?p=452#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>I hope you will enjoy Windows 7 more. :)

High CPU usage by svchost is often caused by a problem with automatic update of Windows or by malware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you will enjoy Windows 7 more. :)</p>
<p>High CPU usage by svchost is often caused by a problem with automatic update of Windows or by malware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukstokes.com/blog/?p=452#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve upgraded to Windows 7 now :-)

On Vista the offending process was usually svchost.exe, which does not really give the game away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've upgraded to Windows 7 now :-)</p>
<p>On Vista the offending process was usually svchost.exe, which does not really give the game away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecilia</title>
		<link>http://ukstokes.com/blog/2009/08/12/ive-had-it-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukstokes.com/blog/?p=452#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>Memory is supposed to be used and is used to make the computer faster. Why have unused memory?

I have a similar computer and the CPU is only used a few percent usually. What process is using the CPU a lot according to the Processes tab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memory is supposed to be used and is used to make the computer faster. Why have unused memory?</p>
<p>I have a similar computer and the CPU is only used a few percent usually. What process is using the CPU a lot according to the Processes tab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

